FAA:
Dallas controllers falsified reports
By Alan Levin,
USA TODAY
May 2008
WASHINGTON —
Dallas air-traffic controllers hid
dozens of safety errors that allowed planes to fly too close together, federal
officials said Thursday.
Air-traffic officials blamed pilots for the errors when air traffic
managers were actually to blame, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said.
Though most of the incidents were not serious, a handful were classified as
significant safety risks, said Hank Krakowski, the agency's newly appointed
chief of air traffic.
The revelations marked the second time in the past two months that
federal whistle-blowers raised safety concerns at the FAA. The FAA admitted in
March that inspectors overseeing Southwest Airlines allowed the carrier to fly
planes that had not received critical safety inspections. A subsequent review of
all airlines' maintenance triggered massive groundings after additional safety
violations were found, disrupting travel for hundreds of thousands of people.
A federal watchdog who shepherded whistle-blower allegations in both
cases charged that the FAA suffers from a culture of "complacency and cover up."
"This culture did not develop on its own," U.S. Special Counsel
Scott Bloch said. "I believe it happened with the complicity of higher
management and could not have been possible without the support of leadership in
Washington."
FAA officials said that the falsification of error reports appears
to be limited to
Dallas. They announced a series of
steps to prevent it from occurring again.
"We're not going to stand for this," acting FAA Administrator Robert
Sturgell said.
Federal investigators with the Transportation Department's inspector
general corroborated allegations from whistle-blowers that air-traffic managers
at a FAA facility that monitors flights within 40 miles of Dallas routinely and
intentionally falsified reports involving planes that flew too close together,
the FAA said.
The inspector general's office found that controllers claimed that
62 such incidents between November 2005 and July 2007 were the fault of pilots
when, in fact, controllers had caused the error. The Inspector General Calvin
Scovel's report has not been officially released but was described by the FAA.
Similar allegations against the
Dallas facility were made in 2004 by
a whistle-blower and the FAA promised to reform how errors are reported.
However, the fixes "were not executed appropriately," and falsification of
records continued, Krakowski said.
Only a handful of the errors were classified as significant safety
risks, Krakowski said. The inspector general's office found that the problem was
isolated in
Dallas, he said.
Krakowski said he transferred two supervisors at the
Dallas facility last January after
learning of the charges. Krakowski said he will no longer allow local managers
to investigate controller errors. The agency is also introducing a newly
developed computer system that automatically tracks when planes get too close.
Such systems are already in place for high-altitude traffic, but a new system
was designed for the more complex rules that govern flights as they near
airports.